Middle age is a turning point in one's life stage, and it is also a stage where wisdom and maturity coexist. At this stage, people should reflect on their past, sum up experience and plan for the future. There are three things, after middle age, we should be careful to avoid self-inflicted consequences. First, do not overreach, feet firmly hidden in the heart. Middle-aged people should be well aware of their own abilities and limitations, and not blindly pursue illusory goals while neglecting the immediate work and responsibilities. Many middle-aged people are eager to make a breakthrough in their career, but neglect their family and physical health, which will be more than worth the loss, and eventually leave regrets. For example, Mr. Li pursued career success in middle age, worked overtime every day, and paid little attention to his family, resulting in estranged family relations and damaged physical health. This is a typical case of overreaching, so middle-aged people should know how to cherish everything in front of them, down to earth, and do not get lost in the illusory distance. When people reach middle age, they must find their own rhythm and continue to live well in accordance with their own rhythm in order to go further. Second, give up the good teacher, hollow as grain practice in the line. In middle age, many people have more or less achievements, at this time, we should maintain a humble attitude, do not be self-righteous, do not blindly give people advice, but should constantly improve their own cultivation and quality in humility. For example, when Ms. Zhang became a senior executive in her middle age, she often decided the direction of the company based on her own experience and opinions, ignoring the advice of others in her team. Such behavior is likely to lead to a decline in team morale, so that individuals in the company can not play their own advantages, and ultimately will inevitably weaken the cohesion of the entire team. Middle-aged people should give up this kind of attitude of being good to others and be vain, which can not only increase their own wisdom, but also improve the effectiveness and cohesion of the team. In middle age, one of the most valuable qualities is to understand that there is something to be done and something to be done. There are things that need to be done as a team, don't be individual heroism. When you need a team effort and you need to listen to the opinions of individuals in the team, don't act arbitrarily, or you may be isolated. Third, do not be "soft hearted" and help the poor with edges and corners. Middle-aged people tend to be kind and kind, but sometimes being too kind can lead to problems. When facing difficulties and crises, middle-aged people should remain resolute and firm, and not be blinded by their own kindness. For example, in middle age, Mr. Wang encountered difficulties in borrowing money from a relative. Although he knew that the relative was not a person he could trust, he lent it to him out of kindness, which eventually led to financial losses and the breakdown of interpersonal relationships. This is the negative impact of "gentleness of heart", middle-aged people in the face of difficulties and crises, should know how to maintain a certain degree of rationality and calm, rather than being affected by their own kindness. Middle age is a very important stage in life, we should bear in mind the three advice of aiming high, giving up good advice to teachers, and not "soft hearted". Only by staying grounded and confident, while remaining resolute and firm, can we live a more leisurely and happy life after middle age. If you have the three problems mentioned above, often do those three things intentionally or unintentionally, I hope you can quit after middle age, otherwise the pain is yourself.
Kong Fuzi is not a moralist who speaks of benevolence and righteousness, and what he teaches his students is not an abstract theory. He does not encourage his students to be nerds in the ivory tower, but rather to show their skills in the real world. One of his disciples Zixia said: "Learning and being good makes a scholar, and being good makes a scholar, and studying and working as an official should complement each other." There are many life experiences in the Analects of Confucius that teach students how to behave in the world. Some people say: It is better not to read than not to know people. The first thing to do in life is to learn to read people. Confucius taught, "Look at his reasons, see his reasons, and see where he lives." How can a man hide? How can a man hide?" To understand a person, there are three points: the first is to look at his motivation; The second is to observe his means of doing things; The third is to examine what he is comfortable doing. If these three points are clear, what else can people hide? These three points look simple, but it is actually not easy to do. Even old Master Confucius had mistakes, and he once said bitterly: Take people with words, and give them when they lose. Zaiyu was an excellent disciple of Confucius, and his eloquence was excellent. At first, Confucius heard him speak very insightful and liked him very much, but later found that the boy was a little inconsistent. Once, Zaiyu sleep during the day, Confucius looked very angry, said: "rotten wood can not be carved, the wall of dirt can not be carved, rotten wood can not be carved, the long pile of dirt walls can not be painted." That's a pretty good comment. It's every word. Not to mention this, Confucius went on to say, "From the beginning, I listen to others and believe in their actions; Now I listen to what people say and watch what they do. "At first, when I hear what people say, I believe what they do. Today, when I hear his words, I examine his deeds. It can be seen that to know people, first learn to speak. Confucius said, "If you do not know what you are saying, you cannot know who you are." However, Confucius gives people the feeling that he does not love to talk, he teaches students "gentlemen want to be slow in speech and quick in action", but in fact, Confucius not only loves to talk, but also a master of talking, he hates is "rhetoric", rhetoric, is "off-guard", full of mouth running train, east parents, west family short and so on. And Confucius speech is very careful, pay attention to "therefore less than the tongue", that is, a gentleman's word, four words can not be recalled. So, how should a gentleman speak? Confucius said, "If you are with words but not with them, you lose people; Do not go with words and with words." Should not say, lose friends; You shouldn't be talking nonsense, wasting your breath. Confucius also taught how to talk with teachers, leaders, etc., "What is not enough is called mania, what is not enough is hidden, what is not seen color is called blind." You rush to speak before it is your turn, this is rash; It is your turn to say, but you do not say, this is deliberately concealed; He who speaks without looking at the faces of others is blind. This is Confucius's philosophy of speaking. Confucius also had his own ideas about making friends. As we know, friends are very important in life. How to make friends? Confucius said there are three kinds of good friends and three kinds of bad friends. Good friends are: friends straight, friends understanding, friends informed, that is, honest people, honest people, well-informed people, these three kinds of people are good friends. Bad friends are: friends will be open, friendly and gentle, friends will be sycophant, that is, the heart of the evil and not right people, good at flattery, used to talk people, these three kinds of people are bad friends. About making friends, Confucius also has a general principle: no friend is better than oneself. Don't make friends with people who are not as good as you, of course, this is not to make everyone snobbish, but to communicate with people who are stronger than you in virtue, knowledge, and ability. It's important to have a sense of proportion when dealing with friends. Confucius said: "The number of the king, shame; The number of friends is sparse." It means that if you give repeated advice to the leader, you will incur humiliation; Repeated advice to a friend will lead to estrangement. What to do? "Advice and good way, can not stop, do not humiliate yourself", that is, Confucius said the middle way, to be impartial, compromise, do everything, to grasp the degree, grasp the heat, neither can not meet the requirements, can not do too much, the so-called too much.
For the communicator, social relations seem to be nothing more than a free, optional and changeable interpersonal interaction, so that the "reality" as it is understood is nothing more than a collection of external phenomena and information perceived by the individual. In this sense, the "blending of virtuality and reality" is nothing more than the "similarity" of fleeting appearances and their replicas, neither of which is the real reality. On the contrary, Marxist social relations are reality itself. To criticize this aspect is to grasp the essence of the meta-universe to a large extent. There are two approaches to such criticism: one is to actively maintain the meta-universe and the powerful productive forces it represents, and to be vigilant and transform the hierarchical relationships in it; The other is to completely return to the technical level and production relations of the metauniverse, to return to Marx's critique of capital, to reveal that the essence of the metauniverse is nothing but the condensation of capital under the production of new technologies. For the former approach, some scholars have used Marx's "phantom metaphor" and pointed out quite perceptively that the real effect of the "meta-cosmic structure" is that "the relations between people acquire the nature of a virtual body, and thus acquire a 'ghostly object', which masks its basic essence with its strict, seemingly perfect and reasonable autonomy." That is, all traces of the relationship between people ", "the meta-universe is not a romantic illusion that has got rid of the real social relations", it is precisely based on the "real social relations", is "a new landscape, a reshaping of social relations presented under virtual and digital technology". Such social relations are, of course, hierarchical and involve material interests, for which the meta-universe becomes a disguised instrument. However, in his view, we do not have to "destroy the technological foundations of the meta-universe," but to explore "how to use the space of the meta-universe to shape shared and equal social relations." In this regard, removing the centralization of the media platform itself seems to be one of the measures to equalize the meta-universe. This vision of equality is also positively and critically conceived in the latest work of F. Richard Yu: "Like our real-world universe, the meta-universe has developed special socio-economic structures in an orderly manner." It enables the rapid flow of matter, energy, information, and intelligence, effectively reducing the imbalance of matter, energy, information, and intelligence, thereby promoting the stability of the meta-universe and the real-world universe." He argued that metaverse evolution follows the laws of the real universe (such as Maslow's hierarchy of needs), but is faster and creates elements that are not present in the real world. Obviously, for the "equality" that is difficult to achieve in the real universe, we can only hope that the meta-universe, although it is still unequal at present (because it must conform to the laws of the real world first). Compared with the relatively moderate position above, the representative of the latter approach seems to be more austere. In this view, since the development of technology and intelligence is nothing more than "the infinite desire of capital for surplus value", then the sudden emergence of the meta-universe assumption is actually "another wonderful exercise of capital and technology collusion", "but the internal need of financial capital to explore new investment growth points for itself"; Since the meta-universe relies on the "technological base", it must be "a manifestation of technological radicalization promoted by the logic of capital in the big industrial age", in the world of the meta-universe, "people will have to live more and more dependent on the development of network technology", "financial capital will be more and more dependent on the sale of new concepts to sustain its life". When the shelter is removed and the capital is exposed, the relationship between "virtual" and "real" is not the same/different and continuation/rupture in the ideal sense. Whether virtual and reality are parallel or integrated, they are either fierce struggle, or hidden. The metaverse can be a revolutionary opportunity to overturn inequality, but won't it also be a substitute for illusory compensation? In the sense of the above phantom metaphor, will the meta-universe also become an Althusserian picture of an "ideological machine," another kind of spiritual opium? This illusion itself has led many scholars to overlook the capital game at play. The meta-universe is only a new battlefield (or "mental battlefield") of real struggle and compromise. Thus, another meta-problem arises, or an ancient conundrum: how to conceive of a space that is both intrinsically combative and harmonious? Iv. Ontology and the Anthropocene For the previous meta problem, we can also ask, how can we conceive of a more "original" meta
She's the king of KingsOf course she didn't feel tired at allAlthough her body is a little bitI can tell the smell is not goodWeekly study comments to shareGain great benefits from comprehensive learningNot just expertiseAnd then you get commuting informationHad to succumb to her great loveA group you have to admireThe same age or youngerThe good ones make people jealous of that skillWe do see on-the-job education"This class" highlights the skills of shining pointsRich experience and practiceLet even if the "peco class" is not as goodThe third day to their own ppt shareNever found sharing ppt beforeIt's such a different feelingAfter all, it's too much to sayThat's a lotDiscomfort and nervousness?Can not sayHow from each timeLack of thinking or how to go furtherOr whether what you want to achieve is maximalWhat do you think?How about exerciseComprehensive and focusedPrepare in advanceIdea collectionScientifically soundAnalyze and solveBe thoroughly integratedexpressionLet ppt etc shareBecome a good and frequent "line"
It is reflected in several aspects: 1, influenced by various literature, film and television works, people with a little level think of themselves very high, and feel that their soul is still interesting, so the soft requirements for the other side are relatively high. 2, but in a society with a hierarchical system of resources, in fact, the combination is more to look at the resources behind, so in the end, it is necessary to look at the background, look at the origin, look at the conditions, so those who say interesting souls in the mouth, when introducing themselves is these copper smelly goods, they will compare their prices.For example, "excellent", as if it is very aspirant and pursued, is actually a ranking under some standard, suggesting some kind of pride in this bovine force and other slag. A child once used excellent to a foreigner was scolded by me, what qualifications do you have to evaluate each other excellent, you are not his mentor, you can only say amazing, interesting and other equal subjective opinions. So on, the so-called spiritual label, seemingly unique pride, is actually the inferiority of hierarchical thinking. 3, so the final combination is actually mostly people who meet the material conditions, and the proportion of spiritual satisfaction is very small. If you do not realize that you are actually a material person, the other person's spirit is not satisfied, the soul is not interesting enough, and you can not accept it for a while, then leave. Or spiritual fit, and the material conditions can not meet the so-called spiritual pursuit, or can not bear, leave. Therefore, often those who do not regard themselves as high and the spiritual pursuit is not high can live on. 4, and then the successful lesson of these people who live a "happy" life is, don't think too much, don't ask too much, just about. Finally, people who "sublimate" in advance of the spirit are not willing to hang on the wall haha. Of course, there is nothing wrong with this, but this is not something to be proud of, whether you are a man or a woman, material or detached, under a certain level, just labor dividends, is a reproductive donkey, is the fuel of economic development, this is a matter that needs to fight together, rather than complacent victory. So, in the first place, there was no need to communicate.